WE PROTECT YOUR INTERESTS PROVIDE EXPERIENCE FIGHT FOR YOU
Top Employment & Personal Injury Attorneys in Los Angeles
Millions Recovered for Our Clients
experienced
We have handled many cases just like yours
effective
We consistently achieve excellent results
Highly Recommended
We are attentive to your needs and will work tirelessly on your behalf
Welcome to MSD Lawyers
Personalized Service
Employment & Personal Injury Attorneys
Located in downtown Los Angeles, MSD represents clients in industries as diverse as the city itself. From employment disputes to catastrophic injuries and wrongful death, to complex business litigation, MSD will aggressively protect your interests in every stage of a dispute, from inception to trial.
Camron Dowlatshahi speaking to USA Today about Jimmy Kimmel’s suspension
The suspension of Jimmy Kimmel Live! has sparked debate over the boundaries of political speech and broadcast regulation. Entertainment and media attorney, Camron Dowlatshahi notes that the FCC’s reported involvement, focused not on profanity or explicit content but on perceived political messaging, marks an unusual moment for media oversight. The situation highlights growing tensions between entertainment, politics, and free expression, raising questions about
Attorney Camron Dowlatshahi Breaks Down Smokey Robinson Sexual Abuse Allegations on KTLA
In a recent KTLA segment, employment and entertainment attorney Camron Dowlatshahi of MSD Lawyers offered expert legal commentary on the serious sexual abuse allegations facing legendary singer Smokey Robinson. The claims, brought by four former housekeepers and a former personal assistant, allege a pattern of misconduct. Dowlatshahi emphasized that when multiple individuals independently come forward with consistent and specific accusations,
Attorney Camron Dowlatshahi Analyzes LADWP’s Legal Defense Strategy
In this video, personal injury attorney Camron Dowlatshahi of MSD Lawyers breaks down the LADWP’s legal defense strategy. He unpacks the utility’s surprising reliance on a 114-year-old court ruling—and explains why he believes that argument may not hold up in court today. 
